Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Hambre. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Hambre. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 11 de septiembre de 2008

HELP HAITI. Storm-struck Haiti: From misery to the abyss



VIDEO: UNICEF Director of Emergency Programmes Louis-Georges Arsenault discusses preparing for and responding to natural disasters in the Caribbean.
high low(Real Player)
Related links
Storms batter the Caribbean, displacing thousands
Subscribe to the UNICEF Newsletter

Caribbean storms displace hundreds of thousands of children and their families
10 September 2008

Hurricane Ike has made its unwelcome presence felt in the Caribbean this week, leaving a path of destruction across many smaller islands before slamming into eastern Cuba, which had already borne the brunt of Hurricanes Gustav and Hanna.
Meanwhile in Haiti, an estimated 800,000 people, including 300,000 children, are struggling to recover from massive flooding caused by the back-to-back storm systems. The government has officially requested international assistance. Large quantities of humanitarian supplies were pre-positioned prior to hurricane season in the Caribbean, but the number of storms that have developed this year was unexpected.
Watch the video. high low
Learn more about the storms battering the Caribbean
Jude Law and Jeremy Gilley visit Afghanistan to promote peaceBritish actor and Peace One Day envoy Jude Law recently travelled to Afghanistan with film director Jeremy Gilley, the founder of the Peace One Day global campaign for ceasefires and non-violence. During their two-day mission, they screened a new documentary, ‘The Day After Peace’, about the efforts of ordinary Afghans to stop the fighting in their country.
Mr. Law and Mr. Gilley asked all parties involved in the conflict to observe International Peace Day again this year. It is scheduled to take place on 21 September. More...
Women and children worst-affected by flooding in Bihar, India
Flooding along the Kosi River has affected almost 2.7 million people in India and about 70,000 in Nepal. The displaced population is largely marginalized, each of them surviving on about 46 cents a day. An estimated 500,000 marooned individuals have been evacuated and 198 relief camps providing food, water and medical supplies have been set up.
UNICEF has supplied bleaching powder to purify water and oral rehydration salts to treat diarrhoeal dehydration – as well as disposable delivery kits, plastic sheeting, vitamin A supplements and other relief supplies. More...
UNICEFUNITE FOR CHILDREN

Doctors with out borders
September 8, 2008


Haiti: After Third Storm, Food and Water Urgently Needed for Displaced


Related Articles
Field NewsMSF Assisting Haitians and Assessing Needs after Successive Hurricanes
Sep 7, 2008
Field NewsHaiti: MSF Treats Over 160 Victims of Violence in Port-au-Prince
Apr 11, 2008
Field NewsMSF Treats Wounded amid Demonstrations in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Apr 9, 2008
View all articles on Haiti »



Storm-struck Haiti: From misery to the abyss
After four storms in less than a month, the little that many Haitians had has turned to nothing at all. Their homes are under water, forcing them onto the roofs. School is canceled. Hunger is intense.

In Devastated Haitian City, A Body as Envoy of Peace (By Joshua Partlow, The Washington Post)

Meager Living of Haitians Is Wiped Out by Storms By MARC LACEYThe resolve of the people of Gonaïves, Haiti, is being tested by a string of tropical storms and hurricanes.

Facts about Haiti (from http://www.cia.gov/):

• Poorest country in the Western Hemisphere(80% live in abject poverty)
• Population: 8.1 million (U.S.=296 million)
• Median Age: 18 years (U.S.=36 years)
• Life Expectancy: 52 years (U.S.=77 years)
• Infant Mortality: 73 deaths/1,000 live births (U.S.=6.5 deaths/1,000 live births)
• Literacy/those over 15 who can read and write: 53% (U.S.=97%)
Online donations are now available (Click here or on Contact & Donations).

Help Haiti Now is a non-profit 501c3 organization which provides food, water, medicine, and educational support to the poor in Haiti. Our missions currently assist two remote communities:
1. Goyavier: 10-mile hike up mountains to expansive community of 10,000 people. What we are doing:• Operating a medical clinic, supplying medicine.• Providing school supplies and sending money for teachers' salaries so 500 kids can go to school. 2. 87th Place: 1 hour by car or 5 hours by foot from nearest town (Montrouis). 300 people live in this remote community.What we are doing:• Buying and delivering large bags of rice and beans, cooking oil, soap, and barrels of water.Additionally, we are sponsoring students at schools in Montrouis and Port-Au-Prince.




* NEWS *• Herald Tribune Newspaper: "Local woman's visit spurs help for Haiti



Mission Trip newsletter: Nov. 2005 (PDF)

miércoles, 9 de julio de 2008

Man Made Hunger


The Group of 8 and man-made hunger
Sunday, July 6, 2008
Thirty countries have already seen food riots this year. The ever higher cost of food could push tens of millions of people into abject poverty and starvation.
To a large degree, this crisis is man-made - the result of misguided energy and farm policies. When heads of the Group of 8 leading industrial nations meet in Japan this week, they must accept their full share of responsibility and lay out clearly what they will do to address this crisis.
To start, they must live up to their 2005 commitment to vastly increase aid to the poorest countries. And they must push other wealthy countries, like those in the Middle East, to help too. They must also commit themselves to reduce or do away with their most egregious agricultural and energy subsidies, which contribute to the spread of hunger throughout the world.
In the last year, the price of corn has risen 70 percent; wheat 55 percent; rice 160 percent. The World Bank estimates that for a group of 41 poor countries the combined shock of rising prices of food, oil and other raw materials over the past 18 months will cost them between 3 and 10 percent of their annual economic output.
Some of the causes are out of governments' control, including the rising cost of energy and fertilizer, and drought in food exporters like Australia. Higher consumption of animal protein in China and India has also driven demand for feed grains.
Wrongheaded policies among rich and poor nations are also playing a big role. Of those, perhaps the most wrongheaded are the tangle of subsidies, mandates and tariffs to encourage the production of biofuels from crops in the United States and the European Union. According to the World Bank, almost all of the growth in global corn production from 2004 to 2007 was devoted to American ethanol production, pushing up corn and animal feed prices and prompting farmers to switch from other crops to corn.
Long-standing farm subsidies in the rich world have also contributed to the crisis, ruining farmers in poor countries and depressing agricultural investment. Rich countries are not the only culprits. At least 30 developing countries have imposed restrictions or bans on the export of foodstuffs. Importing countries are now stockpiling supplies, which takes more food from global markets.
So far there is no sign that the leaders of the developed countries are ready to do what is needed. The United States and Europe have refused to curtail their bio-fuel subsidies or their lavish farm subsidies. They are also falling far short of their aid commitments.
At the 2005 G-8 summit meeting, leaders said that by 2010 wealthier nations would increase annual development aid to poor countries by $50 billion. Yet aid has increased by only $11 billion.
We welcome Bush's pledge to provide $5 billion this year and next to "fight global hunger," but much more must be done. The U.S. remains the stingiest of rich nations when it come to foreign aid.
In a letter to heads of state of the G-8, Robert Zoellick, the World Bank president, estimated that the bank needs $3.5 billion to provide immediate food aid and seed and fertilizer in poor countries. The International Monetary Fund and the World Food Program estimate they need $6.5 billion more in the short term to help feed vulnerable populations. This does not even count the need for essential longer-term investments to increase farm productivity in poor nations in Africa and elsewhere.
As Zoellick wrote, the food crisis is a test of the world's willingness to help the most vulnerable. The leaders gathered in Japan must rise to the challenge.

sábado, 5 de julio de 2008

Doch: Biodiesel ist Schuld!


Die Lebensmittelpreise sind dramatisch angestiegen. Mehr als 100 Millionen Menschen hungern. Schuld daran ist - nach einer Studie der Weltbank - die steigende Produktion von Biodiesel. Vor allem in den USA.

Geheime Studie der Weltbank zur Nahrungsmittelkrise
Biodiesel stärkster Preistreiber
Die Studie birgt - wenn die Zahlen stimmen - eine Menge politischen Sprengstoff. Denn der enorme Anstieg der Preise für Nahrungsmittel, der in vielen Staaten zu Hungerkrisen geführt hat, ist im Wesentlichen auf die massenhafte Produktion von Biokraftstoff zurückzuführen. So das Fazit einer bislang geheim gehaltenen Studie der Weltbank, die der britischen Zeitung "The Guardian" vorliegt. Bis zu 75 Prozent der Preissteigerungen sind demnach auf den Verbrauch von Agrarprodukten und -flächen für die Herstellung von sogenanntem Biodiesel zurückzuführen.


Nur moderate Preissteigerung ohne Biodiesel
"Ohne den Zuwachs bei Biokraftstoffen wäre das weltweite Getreide- und Maisaufkommen nicht so spürbar zurückgegangen und Preissteigerungen durch andere Faktoren wären nur moderat ausgefallen", zitiert das Blatt aus der Studie. Höhere Energie- und Düngemittelpreise seien seit Anfang 2002 bis Februar 2008 lediglich zu 15 Prozent am Steigen der Nahrungsmittelpreise beteiligt gewesen, während die Hauptursache dafür der Ausbau der Biodieselerzeugung sei.
Bei der OECD in Paris will man zwar den Anstieg um 75 Prozent nicht bestätigen, da die Weltbank-Studie zu wenige Details berücksichtige. Gleichwohl hält man auch dort den Trend für richtig: OECD-Direktor Stefan Tangermann kündigte gegenüber tagesschau.de eine eigene umfassende Studie zum Thema an. Diese soll in den kommenden Tagen veröffentlicht werden.

Dossier: Hungerkrise auf drei Kontinenten Reportagen und Hintergründe [mehr]
Schlechte Nachrichten für die Bush-Regierung

Konsequenzen aus der Erhebung der Weltbank erwartet Tangermann nicht. Dafür blieben zu viele Fragen offen. Gleichwohl steht das Ergebnis der Studie in krassem Widerspruch zur offiziellen Haltung Washingtons. US-Präsident George W. Bush hatte stets behauptet, die Erzeugung pflanzlicher Kraftstoffe schlage bei den Preissteigerungen höchstens mit drei Prozent zu Buche, für den massiven Preisanstieg sei vor allem die gestiegene Nachfrage in Indien und China verantwortlich. In den USA wird weltweit am meisten Biosprit produziert.
Entwicklungshilfe-Experten argwöhnen daher, dass die Studie unter Verschluss gehalten wurde, um die Regierung Bush nicht zu brüskieren. "Politische Führer scheinen darauf bedacht zu sein, die Beweise dafür zu unterdrücken, dass Biokraftstoff ein Hauptfaktor der jüngsten Steigerung der Nahrungsmittelpreise ist", sagte Robert Baily, politischer Berater der Hilfsorganisation Oxfam, dem "Guardian".

Bildunterschrift: Hohe Lebensmittelpreise wegen Biosprit, tagesschau 17:00 Uhr [Volker Schwenck, ARD Genf].
Weitere Video-Formate .

Gute Argumente für die Biosprit-Gegner
Als ziemlich sicher darf nun gelten, dass die Ergebnisse der Studie kommende Woche auf dem G8-Gipfel in Japan Thema sein werden. Befürworter eines weltweiten Moratoriums für die Erzeugung pflanzlicher Kraftstoffe könnten sich dann auf die Weltbank-Studie berufen. Zuletzt hatte der UN-Berichterstatter für das Recht auf Nahrung, Jean Ziegler einen Stopp der Produktion von Bio-Kraftstoffen gefordert.


Die steigende Nahrungsmittelpreise haben nach Schätzungen internationaler Hilfsorganisationen dazu geführt, dass in den letzten Jahren weltweit zusätzlich etwa 100 Millionen Menschen in Armut leben müssen.
Öl und Sprit so teuer wie noch nie.
Hintergrund: Warum kehrt der Hunger zurück?.
Uno berät über Ausweg aus Nahrungsmittelkrise.

jueves, 5 de junio de 2008

At food crisis talks, menu is rich with politics


At food crisis talks, menu is rich with politics
By Elisabeth Rosenthal and Andrew Martin

Wednesday, June 4, 2008
ROME: It was supposed to be an emergency conference on food shortages, climate change and energy. At the opening ceremony Tuesday, the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki Moon, noted that there were nearly one billion people short of food and called upon countries gathered here to act with "a sense of purpose and mission."

"Only by acting together, in partnership, can we overcome this crisis," he said.

But when the microphone was opened to the powerful politicians who had flown in from all over the world, they spoke mostly about economics and politics.

The U.S. secretary of agriculture, Ed Schafer, talked about the benefits of biofuels and how genetically modified crops could ease world hunger. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil spoke for half an hour about how Brazilian biofuels were superior to the U.S. offerings. The president of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, talked about how colonialism had created the food crisis. And President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran spoke of the need to inject religion into food politics.

Everyone complained about protectionism, though not their own.

On Wednesday, food experts as well as many representatives from poor countries wondered whether these divided forces could add up to a solution to a global conundrum: how to feed one billion hungry people.

"What is the common denominator here? It is a food crisis," said President Denis Sassou-Nguesso of the Republic of Congo. "That is the immediate problem for us."

At the three-day conference put on here by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, there was a lot of argument this week about whether the high food prices were caused by the rush to biofuels, protective tariffs, the soaring price of oil or distorting subsidies.

There has been much less talk about donors developing the new kind of aid program that most experts agree is needed: one that invests in developing agriculture in poor countries and spends less to ship food halfway around the world to feed hungry people.

"The era of food aid is over - there is no more sending food from America to Africa," Kofi Annan, the former UN secretary general, said in an interview.

Annan was in Rome to announce his latest project, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, a joint program with several UN agencies to assist small African farmers in increasing their output. Donors, he said, need to do more to improve agricultural practice in Africa and Asia, by providing tools, fertilizers, seeds, silos and knowledge.

"Away from the cameras, I am starting to hear the right things," he said, noting that African agricultural productivity has dropped for the past two decades. "I'm hoping they will go home and adopt policies to ensure global food production, on the ground, in Africa, Africa and Asia. It's much more effective."

Indeed, officials from many major donor countries said they had been rethinking food aid policies, if only because food prices are now so high and transport is impossibly expensive, with oil costing more than $130 a barrel. Also, "there are no more surpluses" for food aid, since crops are also used for fuel, Annan said.

Henrietta Fore, head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, said that transport costs were now soaking up 50 percent of the agency's food aid money and that rising prices of essential commodities like oil were "eating away at our purchasing power."

In the past, the U.S. program was heavily weighted toward sending food abroad, and required that its aid be purchased in the United States and transported on American vessels.

"This crisis has made people think again," she said. "We have a new landscape for food and food needs."

Fore said that in a bill now before Congress, 25 percent of food in a new $350 million aid package could be purchased overseas. But even that has not been approved yet.

In the meantime, many representatives from poorer countries expressed frustration at the tenor of the meeting.

"We believe the problem is much more political than everything else," said Walter Poveda Ricaurte, the Ecuadorean agriculture minister. "We have to differentiate between the countries who are really affected by the food crisis and those who are seeing it as an economic opportunity."

He said that when food prices were low, in recent decades, Ecuador had stopped producing its own wheat, corn and soy, favoring cheap imports instead. Now that prices of these commodities have doubled in the past year, the country can no longer afford them, he said.

The conference has raised money: The Islamic Development Bank pledged $1.5 billion Wednesday. The UN secretary general estimated that $15 billion to $20 billion was needed.

But there was little sign that the economic and political disputes that often took center stage here had resulted in new compromises.

Lula attacked the "absurdly protectionist farm policies in rich countries," a clear reference to the United States, which protects its own corn ethanol from competition with Brazilian ethanol, made from sugar cane.

U.S. delegates attacked barriers to trade in poorer countries, which they said made it harder to send food aid, as well as in the European Union, which has resisted allowing the sale of U.S.-made genetically modified seeds.

China, which has not invested heavily in biofuels, said that "grain-based biofuel has driven up grain utilization and has the potential to trigger more far-reaching problems."

Officials at the Food and Agriculture Organization were sanguine about the results. "Sometimes I think the discussion is not focused on the need of countries and poor people," said José Maria Sumpsi, assistant director general of the organization. "But you have to take into account that you are hearing the positions of the governments - defending their political views - which is different from whether they will fund immediate action."

The conference will issue its concluding statement Thursday, and delegates said the wording of the section on biofuels had emerged as a point of contention. The United States says that only 2 to 3 percent of the global increase in food prices is attributable to competition from biofuels. But other countries put the figure far higher.

"I doubt there will be a positive agreement on biofuels," said Schafer, the U.S. agriculture secretary, though he indicated that some "acceptable" language would be in the document.

Weltbank-Chef auf Welternährungsgipfel in Rom


Drei Schritte im Kampf gegen den Hunger
"Wir sind verpflichtet zu handeln, jetzt und gemeinsam." Der Appell des UN-Generalsekretärs auf dem Ernährungsgipfel in Rom richtet sich an die ganze Welt. Und Handeln sei möglich, da Hunger keine Naturkatastrophe sei, sagte Weltbank-Chef Zoellick. Er nannte drei Schritte.

Von Werner Eckert, SWR, zur Zeit in Rom

Ohne Geld geht es nicht, sagt UN-Generalsekretär Ban Ki Moon. In Rom forderte er etwa 15 bis 20 Milliarden Dollar mehr pro Jahr. Damit könnten Notprogramme für die am meisten vom Hunger betroffenen Länder aufgelegt werden.
Unterstützt wurde der UN-Generalsekretär von Robert Zoellick, dem Präsidenten der Weltbank. Es sei genug geredet worden, sagte der. Der Hunger sei keine Naturkatastrophe. Und alle, die in Rom zusammen seien, wüssten, was zu tun ist.

Erstens, zweitens, drittens ...
Zoellick jedenfalls verlangte drei Dinge ganz entschieden: "Zum ersten schlage ich vor, dass diese Konferenz sich verpflichtet, den 20 ärmsten Länder sofort zu helfen. Das muss bis zum G8-Treffen im Juli passieren." Dann müssten die Konferenzteilnehmer in Rom festlegen, dass Saatgut und Dünger zu den Kleinbauern gebracht werde, damit die nächste Ernte gesichert sei. „Das kann den Unterschied zwischen Essen und Hungern ausmachen“, fügte er hinzu. Und Länder müssten ihre Ausfuhrsperren aufheben, die die Preise hochgetrieben hätten und den Ärmsten schadeten.
Wenn diese drei Dinge passierten, dann habe die Rom-Konferenz ihre Arbeit gemacht, sagt der Weltbank-Präsident. Dossier: Hungerkrise auf drei Kontinenten Reportagen und Hintergründe [mehr]
Es geht nicht nur um Biosprit
Die Chefs der UN-Organisationen versuchen vor allem den Eindruck zu verwischen, dass um Biosprit gestritten wird. Viel mehr sprechen sie davon, dass weltweit wieder mehr Nahrungsmittel erzeugt werden müssten und könnten.
Jacques Diouff von der Welternährungsorganisation FAO verwies darauf, dass in manchen Ländern nur zwei Prozent der Bevölkerung Bauern seien und trotzdem noch Überschüsse produzierten. In anderen Ländern könnten 60 bis 80 Prozent der Menschen die Versorgung mit Nahrungsmitteln nicht ausreichend sicherstellen. Denen müsse geholfen werden, damit sie mehr erzeugen könnten.
Umverteilung in Afrika
Ban Ki Moons Vorgänger, Kofi Annan, hat dazu in Rom eine gemeinsame Initiative vieler Organisationen vorgestellt. Das Programm setzt bei den ertragreichen afrikanischen Regionen an: zum Beispiel Mais aus Südafrika, Hirse aus dem Sahel für den afrikanischen Markt. Sechs Prozent höhere Erträge jedes Jahr sind das Ziel.
Ban Ki Moon zeigte sich zuversichtlich, dass die Konferenz konkrete Ergebnisse bringen werde: "Wir können uns nicht leisten, diesen Kampf zu verlieren, der Hunger ist unser Feind. Hunger zerstört alles, wofür wir in den vergangenen Jahren gekämpft haben. Hunger destabilisiert und schafft Konflikte. Wir sind verpflichtet zu handeln, jetzt und gemeinsam."
Reiskrise: "Jeder Preisanstieg für die Armen gefährlich".
Welternährungsgipfel will Lebensmittelkrise lösen.
Dossier: Hungerkatastrophe auf drei Kontinenten.
Linksammlung zur Hungerkrise.
Erfolge und Sorgen vor dem letzten Gipfel-Tag [W. Eckert, SWR].

miércoles, 4 de junio de 2008

UN blames rich nations for food shortages


UN blames rich nations for food shortages
By Elisabeth Rosenthal and Andrew Martin

Tuesday, June 3, 2008
ROME: Resolving the global food crisis could cost as much as $30 billion a year, and wealthier nations are doing little to help developing nations, United Nations officials said here Tuesday.

Dozens of world leaders - from President Nicolas Sarkozy of France to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran to President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe to the secretary general of the United Nations, Ban Ki Moon - descended on Rome on Tuesday for a three-day conference devoted to food security at a time when food prices are at their highest in more than three decades and food stores are at perilous lows.

Jacques Diouf, director general of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and host of the summit, sharply criticized wealthy nations that he said were cutting spending on agriculture programs for the world's poor while spending billions on carbon markets, subsidies for their own farmers and biofuel production.

"The developing countries did, in fact, forge policies, strategies and programs that, if they had received appropriate funding, would have given us world food security," Diouf said, adding that the international community finally mobilized to help only after images of food riots and hunger emerged in the media.

He said there had been plenty of meetings on the need for anti-hunger programs and agricultural development in poor nations in the last decade, but not enough money to make them a reality.

Another major debate at the conference centered on the role of biofuels in producing food shortages. The U.S. delegation here, headed by Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer, maintains that only 2 to 3 percent of the increases in food prices are attributable to the biofuel boom. But UN officials said the contribution was much higher.

Biofuel production affects food prices because farmers in many countries have switched from growing crops for food to growing crops for fuel.

Diouf criticized policies like those in the United States that subsidize growing crops for energy. He said that billion-dollar subsidies and protective tariff policies "have the effect of diverting 100 million tons of cereals from human consumption, mostly to satisfy the thirst for fuel for vehicles."

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil argued that some biofuels could provide a solution to world hunger if properly deployed. In Brazil, where biofuel is made from sugar cane, the industry has provided jobs for poor people as well as sustainable fuel, he said.

The idea that biofuels have caused the world hunger crisis is "an oversimplification" and "an affront that does not stand up to serious discussion," da Silva said. He instead blamed high fuel prices for the high cost of food.

"It offends me to see fingers pointed at biofuels, when the fingers are coated in oil and coal," he said.

There was little disagreement at the meeting about what measures were needed to resolve the spiraling costs of food and its impact on the world's poor: more food aid; additional seeds and fertilizer for poor farmers; fewer export bans and tariffs that restrict the flow of trade; and more agriculture research to improve crop yields.

Ban, the UN secretary general, appealed for immediate financial support from wealthy nations.

"I call on you to take bold and urgent steps to address the root cause of the global food crisis," he said. "This will not be easy. It may require big increases in financial support."

Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, said his goal for the conference was to come away with specific proposals for action, rather than its simply being "a talkfest." He emphasized three immediate priorities: helping the 20 most vulnerable countries feed its hungry; providing seeds and fertilizer to small farmers before the upcoming planting season; and scrapping export bans and restrictions.

Some food experts emphasized that high prices reflected global changes that are likely to be longstanding.

"As high as food prices are, I think over time the overall trend will be to get higher," said Cary Fowler, executive secretary of the Global Crop Diversity Trust.

He said that the current food crisis was different from previous food shortages in that it reflected new and long-term trends: dramatically fluctuating climates in major food-producing countries caused by global warming; higher fuels prices; the shift to meat eating in the developing world; and large foreign currency reserves in countries like Russia and China, allowing them to make large food purchases on the global market.

In addition, the United States and others have suggested that genetically modified crops could play a key role in helping poor nations grow more food, a point that some governments and nonprofit organizations strongly oppose. The United States is by far the world's leading producer of genetically modified crops and seeds.

And at a meeting devoted largely to the economics of food, dominated by talk of biofuels and genetically modified crops, many charitable groups said more basic concerns had been overlooked.

Susan Shepherd of Médecins Sans Frontières said that in Niger, where she works, higher prices meant that families bought less food - or less nutritious food - for their children.

"Even Ban Ki Moon was talking about economics. The only one who really focused on hunger and malnutrition - about the people who go hungry - was the pope," she said, referring to a message from Pope Benedict XVI read at the conference.

martes, 3 de junio de 2008

Crisis Alimentaria! haz algo


Amig@s,
Líderes políticos de todo el Mundo están reunidos en Roma para encontrar una solución al urgente problema de la alza de precios de los alimentos. ¡Juntemos 1 millón de firmas!
Firma aquí
Los precios de los alimentos a nivel mundial han subido a una velocidad record. Desde Bangladesh hasta Sudáfrica cientos de miles de personas hambrientas han salido a protestar a las calles. Los expertos advierten que 100 millones de personas están al borde de la inanición. La ONU organizó una reunión urgente sobre la crisis alimentaria. Necesitamos asegurar que en ese encuentro se tomen medidas duraderas que respondan a las causas profundas de la pobreza y el hambre y no solo reformas superficiales que perpetúen el actual sistema injusto de intercambio y producción de alimentos. Ban Ki Moon, el Secretario General de la ONU, aceptará nuestra petición personalmente este miércoles en Roma. Esta es una gran oportunidad para hacernos oír directamente por las personas que formulan las políticas agrícolas que tanto nos afectan.

Necesitamos conseguir un millón de firmas para que nuestro mensaje sea lo más claro y fuerte posible, por favor, firma en el enlace siguiente y envía este mail a todos tus amigos para correr la voz: http://www.avaaz.org/es/global_food_crisis/10.php?cl=95297329

200.000 miembros de Avaaz ya hemos firmado, pidiendo medidas concretas como más inversión el la productividad agrícola en los países pobres. Lanzamos esa campaña el mes pasado en respuesta a un llamado urgente de la Ministra de Relaciones Exteriores de Sierra Leona, un país en el que 90% de los habitantes no pueden pagar ni una bolsa de arroz al día.

Haz clic arriba para ver el vídeo. La crisis alimentaria, como el cambio climático, nos demuestra lo interconectados que estamos todos en el Mundo actual. Sólo actuando juntos y con determinación podremos resolverla.

Con esperanza, Paul, Ricken, Graziela, Veronique, Ben, Galit, Iain, Pascal, Milena y todo el equipo de Avaaz. PD: Para saber más sobre las campañas de Avaaz: www.avaaz.org/es/report_back_1Y para leer artículos sobre la crisis del hambre: http://actualidad.terra.es/nacional/articulo/lideres_roma_mundiales_abordaran_crisis_2515547.htmhttp://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/511254.htmlhttp://www.elpais.com/articulo/internacional/ONU/pide/1100/millones/contener/crisis/alimentaria/elpepiint/20080602elpepiint_10/Tes

Sobre Avaaz…Avaaz es una organización independiente y sinfines de lucro cuya misión es asegurar que los valores y opiniones de la mayoría de la gente sean tomados en cuenta en las políticas que nos gobiernan. ‘Avaaz’ significa ‘voz’ en varios idiomas asiáticos y europeos. Avaaz no acepta dinero de gobiernos ni de empresas y su equipo esta basado en oficinas en Londres, Nueva York, Washington, Ginebra, Paris y Rio de Janeiro. No se te olvide visitar nuestras páginas Facebook y Myspace y Bebo

miércoles, 21 de mayo de 2008

Se desboca alza en los alimentos


Se desboca alza en los alimentos

Advierte Gobernador del Banco de México que el incremento en granos y otras materias primas continuará en los siguientes meses

Por Moisés Ramírez y Adolfo Navarro

Monterrey, México (21 de mayo de 2008).- Los incrementos en los precios de los alimentos no se detienen.

Durante la primera quincena de mayo, arreciaron las alzas en diversos productos de la canasta básica.

De acuerdo con cifras de la Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor (Profeco), en la Ciudad de México aumentó 22 por ciento en promedio el precio de la tortilla de maíz.

El arroz siguió su carrera alcista y subió 14 por ciento, con lo que acumuló en el año un incremento cercano a 40 por ciento.

No se escapó de esta tendencia el valor del pollo, que se elevó 9 por ciento en la quincena, ni el bolillo, con 6 por ciento.

Aunque hubo reducción en algunos precios, como la pasta para sopa o la carne molida de res, predominaron los incrementos.

Pero eso no es todo.

De acuerdo con el Gobernador del Banco de México, Guillermo Ortiz, el incremento en los precios de los granos y otras materias primas en el mercado internacional continuará durante los siguientes meses.

Al participar en el XX Foro IMEF, que se realiza en Monterrey, Ortiz señaló que este fenómeno de alzas de las materias primas no se había visto desde los años 70 y, aunque ya se percibe cierta estabilidad en el importe de algunos cultivos, como la soya y el maíz, lo que aún falta es ver el efecto en el costo de los productos industrializados.

"Los alimentos procesados todavía van a seguir aumentando porque no acaban de pasar esos incrementos en los precios de los granos hacia los procesados, (mientras que) los precios de la energía quién sabe a dónde vayan a parar", comentó.

Ortiz explicó que el resurgimiento de las economías de China, India y otras naciones ha presionado para que se presenten los actuales niveles de precios en los mercados.

"Los mismos países que nos trajeron desinflación en periodos anteriores, por la baja en los precios de las manufacturas, ahora están provocando una reversión de este proceso por la demanda de materias primas", apuntó.

José Manuel Sánchez Moreno, presidente de la Asociación Nacional de Tiendas de Autoservicio y Departamentales (ANTAD), explicó que el alza de los productos en las tiendas deriva de los aumentos que han efectuado los distribuidores.

"Los proveedores ya no pudieron aguantar los aumentos de precios de sus materias primas y nos subieron a nosotros. Lo que estamos haciendo las cadenas es trasladar esos aumentos", indicó.

La previsión de nuevos incrementos fue confirmada por Jaime Yesaki Cavazos, presidente del Consejo Nacional Agropecuario (CNA), quien adelantó que hay condiciones para que, a partir del segundo semestre del año, suba con mayor fuerza el precio de la carne.

Para hacer frente a esta situación, propuso al Gobierno federal establecer un subsidio directo al ingreso de la población de menores recursos en México.

Ven en riesgo millones de mexicanos.- CEPAL

Al menos 5.2 millones de mexicanos tienen acceso insuficiente a los alimentos, y es esa población la más vulnerable a los efectos del incremento en los precios de éstos, advierte un reporte de la Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL) difundido ayer.

"Dado que las alzas no parecen obedecer a una situación transitoria, es necesario, además de mantener políticas específicas destinadas a los sectores de menos recursos, impulsar propuestas de mediano y largo plazo destinadas a incrementar la oferta y la productividad de manera sustentable", indica el informe "Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio; la Progresión hacia el Derecho y la Salud en América Latina".

La CEPAL concluye que México no ha logrado un avance sustantivo para reducir a la mitad el número de personas que sufren hambre para el 2015.

Con información de Margarita Vega


Copyright © Grupo Reforma Servicio Informativo

ESTA NOTA PUEDES ENCONTRARLA EN:
http://www.reforma.com/negocios/articulo/883704/
Fecha de publicación: 20-May-2008

viernes, 2 de mayo de 2008

Save Darfur: Hunger


Dear Friend,
We must keep our word to the people of Darfur.
Add your name to the thousands of activists who are urging Congress:
Support full funding for peacekeeping and humanitarian aid in Darfur.
Last week, the United Nations World Food Program announced that it will cut half its food supplies to the people of Darfur because of a lack of funds and relentless attacks on its convoys.
Millions of Darfuris depend on this food supply. Without it, they will be pushed even closer to the knife-sharp edge of starvation.
Inaction is not an option when so many lives are at stake.
Congress is preparing to vote on a bill that will significantly increase funding for humanitarian aid and peacekeeping in Darfur. Your representative needs to hear from you NOW because the men, women, and children of Darfur cannot afford any more delays.
Tell your representative to support funding for security and humanitarian aid in Darfur.
Additional funding for Darfur can bring hope to the thousands who have weathered half a decade of genocide. It can provide peacekeepers with training and equipment to protect Darfuri civilians. It can deliver disaster and famine assistance to families desperately in need. And it can help the people of Sudan move towards democracy and determine their own path to peace.
We must meet our obligation to the people of Darfur. Congress has the purse strings. You have the voice. Make sure your voice – and the collective voice of hundreds of thousands of Darfuris – is heard.
Urge your representative to stand up for Darfur and fully fund peacekeeping and humanitarian aid.
With the United Nations World Food Program cutting its food aid to Darfur, the clock is ticking faster and louder than ever - we must act quickly to try to fill this crucial gap.
After you have sent a message to your representative, please click here to ask your friends and family to do the same.

Thank you for your tireless dedication to the people of Darfur.
Best regards,
Colleen ConnorsSave Darfur Coalition

Donate to Help Save DarfurHelp build the political pressure needed to end the crisis in Darfur by supporting the Save Darfur Coalition's crucial awareness and advocacy programs. Click here now to make a secure, tax-deductible online donation.
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-friend!

You can sign up for Save Darfur Coalition.

The Save Darfur Coalition is an alliance of over 180 faith-based, advocacy and human rights organizations whose mission is to raise public awareness about the ongoing genocide in Darfur and to mobilize a unified response to the atrocities that threaten the lives of more than two million people in the Darfur region. To learn more, please visit http://www.savedarfur.org/

*IamYouWeAreTheSame does not belong to Save Darfur Coalition, although we support some of their causes.

jueves, 1 de mayo de 2008

Comunicado del Grupo Avaaz: Hambre

Amig@s,
La inflación de los precios alimentarios podría hundir a millones de personas en el hambre y la miseria—firma la petición, ve el video y ayúdanos parar la nueva crisis del hambre:.
FIRMA LA PETICION

¿Se han dado cuenta que últimamente los precios suben y suben en el supermercado pero los salarios se quedan igual?

Estamos entrando en una crisis de inflación alimentaria mundial que nos afecta a todos. Trabajadores en todo el Mundo—desde Sudáfrica hasta México—protestan ya en las calles. Los que mas sufren son los más vulnerables, en lugares como Haiti y Sierra Leona donde la mayoría de los habitantes no pueden pagar ni siquiera una comida al día. La ONU y organizaciones humanitarias advierten que 100 millones de personas están al borde de la inanición. Los precios suben y con ellos el hambre y la inestabilidad—y las cosas podrían empeorar aun más.No hay tiempo que perder, millones de personas dependen de la voluntad política de unos pocos gobiernos.

Mientras la ONU, el Banco Mundial y agencias humanitarias debaten como combatir la crisis alimentaria, la Ministra de Asuntos Exteriores de Sierra Leona, Zainab Bangura, ha acudido a Avaaz para lanzar una campaña urgente.

Sigue el enlace siguiente para ver un video personal de su parte y unirte al llamado urgente al G8, ONU y EU: http://www.avaaz.org/es/global_food_crisis/26.php



Los precios del maís, el trigo, y el arroz han aumentado más de un 100% . En términos concretos, los millones de personas que apenas podían subsistir cuando una barra de pan costaba 30 centavos, ya no pueden comprarla si cuesta entre 60 y 80 centavos. Estas personas necesitan ayuda humanitaria inmediata, pero también soluciones a largo plazo: que los países ricos examinen más de cerca las políticas que han creado injusticias en la producción, distribución, y comercio de los alimentos. La campaña de Avaaz pide al G8, la EU, y la ONU que manden ayuda inmediata, calmen la especulación financiera desatada en el sector alimentario, evalúen los efectos secundarios de los biocombustibles y confronten las injusticias del actual sistema de comercio e inversión en el sector Agrícola.Estemos donde estemos, la inflación alimentaria nos afecta a todos—y nos demuestra que en este mundo interconectado los problemas nos tocan a todos, pero la soluciones también. Las muertes por hambre se pueden prevenir. Lo que falta no es comida,—si no la voluntad política para repartirla y producirla justa y sosteniblemente.

En el 2008 es inaceptable que alguien se muera de hambre-- este día de solidaridad internacional con trabajadores en todo el Mundo, tomemos el primer paso contra la miseria, por favor firma la petición.

http://www.avaaz.org/es/global_food_crisis/26.php

¡Feliz día del trabajo!Paul, Galit, Ricken, Graziela, Iain, Mark, Pascal y todo el equipo de Avaaz.



PD: Para saber mas

http://www.elmundo.es/especiales/2008/04/internacional/crisis_alimentos/soluciones.htmlhttp://www.milenio.com/index.php/2008/04/29/231336/http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/502546.html



Sobre Avaaz…Avaaz es una organización independiente y sinfines de lucro cuya misión es asegurar que los valores y opiniones de la mayoría de la gente sean tomados en cuenta en las políticas que nos gobiernan. ‘Avaaz’ significa ‘voz’ en varios idiomas asiáticos y europeos. Avaaz no acepta dinero de gobiernos ni de empresas y su equipo esta basado en oficinas en Londres, Nueva York, Washington, Ginebra, Paris y Rio de Janeiro.

No se te olvide visitar nuestras páginas Facebook y Myspace y Bebo

Por favor, añade Avaaz@avaaz.org

Avaaz tiene oficinas en Nueva York, Rio de Janeiro y Londres. Nos puedes escribir al 260 Fifth Avenue, 9th floor, New York, NY 10001 U.S.A.



*IamYouWeAreTheSame no pertenece al grupo Avaaz, solamente apoya algunas de sus causas.

jueves, 24 de abril de 2008

Hunger auf drei Kontinenten


Dossier Tageschau

Steigende Lebensmittelpreise führen zur Krise
Der Hunger kehrt zurück
Vielen galt der Hunger weitgehend als besiegt - jetzt steuert die Welt durch Dürren, Missernten und massive Preissteigerungen bei Grundnahrungsmitteln auf eine neue Ernährungskrise zu. Auf mehreren Kontinenten gibt es hungerbedingte Ausschreitungen. Die Weltbank warnt vor politischer Instabilität in den betroffenen Ländern. Ein Überblick.

Fragen und Antworten zur Hunger-Krise

Einer von sieben Menschen weltweit geht hungrig zu Bett, insgesamt haben 850 Millionen zu wenig zu essen. Was sind die Gründe für die Nahrungsmittelkrise? Wie kann man sie in den Griff bekommen? tagesschau.de hat Fragen und Antworten zusammengestellt. [mehr]
Weltagrarrat fordert Rückkehr zu traditionellen Anbauweisen.
Forum: Essen soll weltweit bezahlbar bleiben .

Debatte um Agrarsubventionen
Exportiert die EU die Nahrungsmittelkrise?

Die Landwirtschaft in den Entwicklungsländern soll produktiver werden, fordert die Bundesregierung. Doch die EU erschwert das seit langem. Exportsubventionen für EU-Produkte stören die Wettbewerbschancen der Bauern in armen Ländern. Erst 2013 sollen die Subventionen auslaufen. [mehr]
Hunger als Preis für den Wohlstand.
Milchbauern drohen erneut mit Lieferstopp.
Dossier: Hungerkatastrophe auf drei Kontinenten.
Werner Eckert mit Einschätzungen zur Nahrungsmittelkrise.

Sturz der Regierung Haitis verschärft instabile Lage
"Ein hungriger Mann ist ein wütender Mann"

Die Hungerrevolte hat Haiti fast ins Chaos gestürzt. Der Regierung wurde gesürzt, aber die Menschen protestieren weiter gegen die hohen Lebensmittelpreise. Die Entwicklung zeigt beispielhaft die Risiken für die politische Stabilität. Michael Castritius zeigt die Gefahren des Hungers. [mehr]
Haiti: Gewalttätiger Protest im Armenhaus der Karibik.
Haiti: Hunger, Wut und Gewalt.
Regierung wegen hoher Lebensmittelpreise gestürzt.
Hunger-Unruhen in Haiti [M. Castritius, ARD Mexiko City].

Gestiegene Lebensmittelpreise in Marokko
"Bürger sind in jämmerlicher Lage"

Auch in Marokko leiden die Menschen unter den Erhöhungen der Lebensmittelpreise. Ihr Zorn richtet sich vor allem gegen die Monopolisten auf dem nationalen Markt. Ihnen wird vorgeworfen, ihre Stellung brutal auszunutzen. Marc Dugge über Wut und Hunger in Marokko. [mehr]
Dossier: Hungerkatastrophe auf drei Kontinenten.
Forum: Essen soll weltweit bezahlbar bleiben .
Demonstrationen gegen hohe Preise [M. Dugge, ARD Rabat].

Hohe Lebensmittelpreise in Ägypten
Um sechs Uhr beginnt der Kampf ums Brot

Ein Generalstreik sollte Ägypten zum Erliegen bringen. Doch Viele waren nach massivem Druck der Regierung offenbar eingeschüchtert, es gab nur wenig Resonanz auf den Aufruf. Der Anlass für die Wut der Menschen bleibt: Die Preise für Lebensmittel, die sich viele nicht mehr leisten können. Golineh Atai berichtet. [mehr]
Weltspiegel: Nächste Sendung um 19.20 Uhr [daserste].
Generalstreik im Keim erstickt [J. Stryjak, ARD Kairo].

Exportbeschränkungen in mehreren Ländern
Biosprit-Anbau lässt Reispreise steigen

Weltweit werden immer mehr Flächen genutzt, um Rohstoffe für Biosprit anzubauen. Die Folge: Weniger Nahrungsmittel werden produziert, die Preise steigen dramatisch - beispielsweise für Reis. Mehrere Länder in Asien erließen inzwischen Exportverbote, um die Versorgung sicherzustellen. Bernd Musch-Borowska berichtet. [mehr]
Biokraftstoff verstärkt Hungerproblem [video].
Biosprit statt Nahrungsmittel [J. Diehl, NDR Tokio].
Sprit statt Nahrungsmittel [B. Musch-Borowska, ARD Singapur].

Mexikaner leiden unter Boom der Biokraftstoffe
Tortillas werden zum Luxusartikel

In Mexiko sind Tortillas Grundnahrungsmittel Nummer eins, aber der Verbrauch ist um ein Drittel zurückgegangen. Grund sind die stark gestiegenen Preise. Denn Mais wird in den USA zu Biokraftstoff verarbeitet. Der Sprithunger raubt mexikanischen Bauern die Existenzgrundlage. Stefan Schaaf berichtet. [video]
Biokraftstoff verstärkt Hungerproblem [video].

Teure Lebensmittel
500 Millionen Dollar gegen Hungerrevolten

Wegen der weltweit gestiegenen Preise für Nahrungsmittel sieht die Weltbank in 33 Ländern die Gefahr von Unruhen. Weltbank und IWF forderten daher von Geberländern 500 Millionen Dollar, um die Uno beim Kauf von Lebensmitteln zu unterstützen. Klaus Kastan stellt die Pläne vor. [mehr]
G8-Treffen: Der Hunger gerät wieder ins Blickfeld.
Forum: Essen soll weltweit bezahlbar bleiben .
Weltbank und IWF warnen vor Krisen [K. Scherer, Washington].
Soforthilfe gefordert [J. Borchers, HR Washington].

UN-Klimabericht
Die Folgen des Klimawandels für die Kontinente

Der Klimawandel wird vor allem die Landwirtschaft in den ärmeren Ländern treffen. In der Folge werden gerade dort, wo die Lebensmittel eh knapp sind, noch knapper - das prognostiziert jedenfalls der UN-Weltklimabericht. [mehr]
Der Klimawandel ist nicht zu stoppen.
Infografik: Der Treibhauseffekt.

viernes, 18 de abril de 2008

The Economist publishes The silent tsunami

The silent tsunami
Apr 17th 2008
From The Economist print edition
Food prices are causing misery and strife around the world. Radical solutions are needed

PICTURES of hunger usually show passive eyes and swollen bellies. The harvest fails because of war or strife; the onset of crisis is sudden and localised. Its burden falls on those already at the margin.
Today's pictures are different. “This is a silent tsunami,” says Josette Sheeran of the World Food Programme, a United Nations agency. A wave of food-price inflation is moving through the world, leaving riots and shaken governments in its wake. For the first time in 30 years, food protests are erupting in many places at once. Bangladesh is in turmoil (see article); even China is worried (see article). Elsewhere, the food crisis of 2008 will test the assertion of Amartya Sen, an Indian economist, that famines do not happen in democracies.
Famine traditionally means mass starvation. The measures of today's crisis are misery and malnutrition. The middle classes in poor countries are giving up health care and cutting out meat so they can eat three meals a day. The middling poor, those on $2 a day, are pulling children from school and cutting back on vegetables so they can still afford rice. Those on $1 a day are cutting back on meat, vegetables and one or two meals, so they can afford one bowl. The desperate—those on 50 cents a day—face disaster.
Roughly a billion people live on $1 a day. If, on a conservative estimate, the cost of their food rises 20% (and in some places, it has risen a lot more), 100m people could be forced back to this level, the common measure of absolute poverty. In some countries, that would undo all the gains in poverty reduction they have made during the past decade of growth. Because food markets are in turmoil, civil strife is growing; and because trade and openness itself could be undermined, the food crisis of 2008 may become a challenge to globalisation.
First find $700m
Rich countries need to take the food problems as seriously as they take the credit crunch. Already bigwigs at the World Bank and the United Nations are calling for a “new deal” for food. Their clamour is justified. But getting the right kind of help is not so easy, partly because food is not a one-solution-fits-all problem and partly because some of the help needed now risks making matters worse in the long run.
The starting-point should be that rising food prices bear more heavily on some places than others. Food exporters, and countries where farmers are self-sufficient, or net sellers, benefit. Some countries—those in West Africa which import their staples, or Bangladesh, with its huge numbers of landless labourers—risk ruin and civil strife. Because of the severity there, the first step must be to mend the holes in the world's safety net. That means financing the World Food Programme properly. The WFP is the world's largest distributor of food aid and its most important barrier between hungry people and starvation. Like a $1-a-day family in a developing country, its purchasing power has been slashed by the rising cost of grain. Merely to distribute the same amount of food as last year, the WFP needs—and should get—an extra $700m.
And because the problems in many places are not like those of a traditional famine, the WFP should be allowed to broaden what it does. At the moment, it mostly buys grain and doles it out in areas where there is little or no food. That is necessary in famine-ravaged places, but it damages local markets. In most places there are no absolute shortages and the task is to lower domestic prices without doing too much harm to farmers. That is best done by distributing cash, not food—by supporting (sometimes inventing) social-protection programmes and food-for-work schemes for the poor. The agency can help here, though the main burden—tens of billions of dollars' worth—will be borne by developing-country governments and lending institutions in the West.
Such actions are palliatives. But the food crisis of 2008 has revealed market failures at every link of the food chain (see article). Any “new deal” ought to try to address the long-term problems that are holding poor farmers back.
Then stop the distortions
In general, governments ought to liberalise markets, not intervene in them further. Food is riddled with state intervention at every turn, from subsidies to millers for cheap bread to bribes for farmers to leave land fallow. The upshot of such quotas, subsidies and controls is to dump all the imbalances that in another business might be smoothed out through small adjustments onto the one unregulated part of the food chain: the international market.
For decades, this produced low world prices and disincentives to poor farmers. Now, the opposite is happening. As a result of yet another government distortion—this time subsidies to biofuels in the rich world—prices have gone through the roof. Governments have further exaggerated the problem by imposing export quotas and trade restrictions, raising prices again. In the past, the main argument for liberalising farming was that it would raise food prices and boost returns to farmers. Now that prices have massively overshot, the argument stands for the opposite reason: liberalisation would reduce prices, while leaving farmers with a decent living.
There is an occasional exception to the rule that governments should keep out of agriculture. They can provide basic technology: executing capital-intensive irrigation projects too large for poor individual farmers to undertake, or paying for basic science that helps produce higher-yielding seeds. But be careful. Too often—as in Europe, where superstitious distrust of genetic modification is slowing take-up of the technology—governments hinder rather than help such advances. Since the way to feed the world is not to bring more land under cultivation, but to increase yields, science is crucial.
Agriculture is now in limbo. The world of cheap food has gone. With luck and good policy, there will be a new equilibrium. The transition from one to the other is proving more costly and painful than anyone had expected. But the change is desirable, and governments should be seeking to ease the pain of transition, not to stop the process itself.

More About Hunger

Photo: Tyler Hicks/The New York Times


"They look at me and say, ‘Papa, I’m hungry,’ and I have to look away. It’s humiliating and it makes you angry."
SAINT LOUIS MERISKA, of Haiti, whose children went without food the day before.

As food prices for staples like beans, corn and rice grow out of reach around the world, hunger in Haiti has become fierce.

Across Globe, Empty Bellies Bring Rising Anger
April 18, 2008
By MARC LACEY
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti — Hunger bashed in the front gate of Haiti’s presidential palace. Hunger poured onto the streets, burning tires and taking on soldiers and the police. Hunger sent the country’s prime minister packing.
Haiti’s hunger, that burn in the belly that so many here feel, has become fiercer than ever in recent days as global food prices spiral out of reach, spiking as much as 45 percent since the end of 2006 and turning Haitian staples like beans, corn and rice into closely guarded treasures.
Saint Louis Meriska’s children ate two spoonfuls of rice apiece as their only meal recently and then went without any food the following day. His eyes downcast, his own stomach empty, the unemployed father said forlornly, “They look at me and say, ‘Papa, I’m hungry,’ and I have to look away. It’s humiliating and it makes you angry.”
That anger is palpable across the globe. The food crisis is not only being felt among the poor but is also eroding the gains of the working and middle classes, sowing volatile levels of discontent and putting new pressures on fragile governments.
In Cairo, the military is being put to work baking bread as rising food prices threaten to become the spark that ignites wider anger at a repressive government. In Burkina Faso and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa, food riots are breaking out as never before. In reasonably prosperous Malaysia, the ruling coalition was nearly ousted by voters who cited food and fuel price increases as their main concerns.
“It’s the worst crisis of its kind in more than 30 years,” said Jeffrey D. Sachs, the economist and special adviser to the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon. “It’s a big deal and it’s obviously threatening a lot of governments. There are a number of governments on the ropes, and I think there’s more political fallout to come.”
Indeed, as it roils developing nations, the spike in commodity prices — the biggest since the Nixon administration — has pitted the globe’s poorer south against the relatively wealthy north, adding to demands for reform of rich nations’ farm and environmental policies. But experts say there are few quick fixes to a crisis tied to so many factors, from strong demand for food from emerging economies like China’s to rising oil prices to the diversion of food resources to make biofuels.
There are no scripts on how to handle the crisis, either. In Asia, governments are putting in place measures to limit hoarding of rice after some shoppers panicked at price increases and bought up everything they could.
Even in Thailand, which produces 10 million more tons of rice than it consumes and is the world’s largest rice exporter, supermarkets have placed signs limiting the amount of rice shoppers are allowed to purchase.
But there is also plenty of nervousness and confusion about how best to proceed and just how bad the impact may ultimately be, particularly as already strapped governments struggle to keep up their food subsidies.
‘Scandalous Storm’
“This is a perfect storm,” President Elías Antonio Saca of El Salvador said Wednesday at the World Economic Forum on Latin America in Cancún, Mexico. “How long can we withstand the situation? We have to feed our people, and commodities are becoming scarce. This scandalous storm might become a hurricane that could upset not only our economies but also the stability of our countries.”
In Asia, if Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi of Malaysia steps down, which is looking increasingly likely amid postelection turmoil within his party, he may be that region’s first high- profile political casualty of fuel and food price inflation.
In Indonesia, fearing protests, the government recently revised its 2008 budget, increasing the amount it will spend on food subsidies by about $280 million.
“The biggest concern is food riots,” said H.S. Dillon, a former adviser to Indonesia’s Ministry of Agriculture. Referring to small but widespread protests touched off by a rise in soybean prices in January, he said, “It has happened in the past and can happen again.”
Last month in Senegal, one of Africa’s oldest and most stable democracies, police in riot gear beat and used tear gas against people protesting high food prices and later raided a television station that broadcast images of the event. Many Senegalese have expressed anger at President Abdoulaye Wade for spending lavishly on roads and five-star hotels for an Islamic summit meeting last month while many people are unable to afford rice or fish.
“Why are these riots happening?” asked Arif Husain, senior food security analyst at the World Food Program, which has issued urgent appeals for donations. “The human instinct is to survive, and people are going to do no matter what to survive. And if you’re hungry you get angry quicker.”
Leaders who ignore the rage do so at their own risk. President René Préval of Haiti appeared to taunt the populace as the chorus of complaints about la vie chère — the expensive life — grew. He said if Haitians could afford cellphones, which many do carry, they should be able to feed their families. “If there is a protest against the rising prices,” he said, “come get me at the palace and I will demonstrate with you.”
When they came, filled with rage and by the thousands, he huddled inside and his presidential guards, with United Nations peacekeeping troops, rebuffed them. Within days, opposition lawmakers had voted out Mr. Préval’s prime minister, Jacques-Édouard Alexis, forcing him to reconstitute his government. Fragile in even the best of times, Haiti’s population and politics are now both simmering.
“Why were we surprised?” asked Patrick Élie, a Haitian political activist who followed the food riots in Africa earlier in the year and feared they might come to Haiti. “When something is coming your way all the way from Burkina Faso you should see it coming. What we had was like a can of gasoline that the government left for someone to light a match to it.”
Dwindling Menus
The rising prices are altering menus, and not for the better. In India, people are scrimping on milk for their children. Daily bowls of dal are getting thinner, as a bag of lentils is stretched across a few more meals.
Maninder Chand, an auto-rickshaw driver in New Delhi, said his family had given up eating meat altogether for the last several weeks.
Another rickshaw driver, Ravinder Kumar Gupta, said his wife had stopped seasoning their daily lentils, their chief source of protein, with the usual onion and spices because the price of cooking oil was now out of reach. These days, they eat bowls of watery, tasteless dal, seasoned only with salt.
Down Cairo’s Hafziyah Street, peddlers selling food from behind wood carts bark out their prices. But few customers can afford their fish or chicken, which bake in the hot sun. Food prices have doubled in two months.
Ahmed Abul Gheit, 25, sat on a cheap, stained wooden chair by his own pile of rotting tomatoes. “We can’t even find food,” he said, looking over at his friend Sobhy Abdullah, 50. Then raising his hands toward the sky, as if in prayer, he said, “May God take the guy I have in mind.”
Mr. Abdullah nodded, knowing full well that the “guy” was President Hosni Mubarak.
The government’s ability to address the crisis is limited, however. It already spends more on subsidies, including gasoline and bread, than on education and health combined.
“If all the people rise, then the government will resolve this,” said Raisa Fikry, 50, whose husband receives a pension equal to about $83 a month, as she shopped for vegetables. “But everyone has to rise together. People get scared. But we will all have to rise together.”
It is the kind of talk that has prompted the government to treat its economic woes as a security threat, dispatching riot forces with a strict warning that anyone who takes to the streets will be dealt with harshly.
Niger does not need to be reminded that hungry citizens overthrow governments. The country’s first postcolonial president, Hamani Diori, was toppled amid allegations of rampant corruption in 1974 as millions starved during a drought.
More recently, in 2005, it was mass protests in Niamey, the Nigerien capital, that made the government sit up and take notice of that year’s food crisis, which was caused by a complex mix of poor rains, locust infestation and market manipulation by traders.
“As a result of that experience the government created a cabinet-level ministry to deal with the high cost of living,” said Moustapha Kadi, an activist who helped organize marches in 2005. “So when prices went up this year the government acted quickly to remove tariffs on rice, which everyone eats. That quick action has kept people from taking to the streets.”
The Poor Eat Mud
In Haiti, where three-quarters of the population earns less than $2 a day and one in five children is chronically malnourished, the one business booming amid all the gloom is the selling of patties made of mud, oil and sugar, typically consumed only by the most destitute.
“It’s salty and it has butter and you don’t know you’re eating dirt,” said Olwich Louis Jeune, 24, who has taken to eating them more often in recent months. “It makes your stomach quiet down.”
But the grumbling in Haiti these days is no longer confined to the stomach. It is now spray-painted on walls of the capital and shouted by demonstrators.
In recent days, Mr. Préval has patched together a response, using international aid money and price reductions by importers to cut the price of a sack of sugar by about 15 percent. He has also trimmed the salaries of some top officials. But those are considered temporary measures.
Real solutions will take years. Haiti, its agriculture industry in shambles, needs to better feed itself. Outside investment is the key, although that requires stability, not the sort of widespread looting and violence that the Haitian food riots have fostered.
Meanwhile, most of the poorest of the poor suffer silently, too weak for activism or too busy raising the next generation of hungry. In the sprawling slum of Haiti’s Cité Soleil, Placide Simone, 29, offered one of her five offspring to a stranger. “Take one,” she said, cradling a listless baby and motioning toward four rail-thin toddlers, none of whom had eaten that day. “You pick. Just feed them.”
Reporting was contributed by Lydia Polgreen from Niamey, Niger, Michael Slackman from Cairo, Somini Sengupta from New Delhi, Thomas Fuller from Bangkok and Peter Gelling from Jakarta, Indonesia.

Food Prices and Supply

Mehr über Mais Preise und Hunger


Energieerzeugung mit Biogasanlagen weniger rentabel
Der Mais-Preis und das Biogas
Von Dorothee Bürkle
Den Landwirten ging es schlecht, die Preise waren tief. Also wurde Werner Prümers vom Landwirt zum Energiewirt und investierte in eine Biogasanlage. Doch jetzt hat sich der Mais-Preis verdoppelt und damit ist der Mais viel zu teuer, um ihn zu verbrennen.

Landwirt und Energiewirt Prümers
Butterberge und Milchseen gab es so lange Werner Prümers denken kann und die Preise für landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse waren niedrig. Deshalb hat der Landwirt aus Steinfurt im Münsterland zusammen mit 75 Kollegen 2005 vier Millionen Euro in eine Biogasanlage investiert und verfeuert seither Gülle und etwa zehn Prozent seiner Maisernte. Für die Landwirte sollte die Anlage ein Einstieg in den lukrativen Energiemarkt werden.
Vom Landwirt zum Energiewirt - und wieder zurück

30 Tonnen täglich für die Biogasanlage
Doch das könnte eine falsche Entscheidung gewesen sein. Der Preis für Mais stieg in den vergangenen Monaten auf das Doppelte und ist jetzt zu teuer, um verbrannt zu werden. Aber die Biogasanlage, die Strom und Heizwärme für über 4.000 Haushalte liefert, muss befeuert werden, täglich mit 30 Tonnen Mais. 300.000 Euro im Jahr sollte der Betrieb der Biogasanlage kosten, so die ursprüngliche Kalkulation, derzeit müssen die Landwirte jedoch Mais im Wert von 550.000 Euro verbrennen. Werner Prümers ist verwundert, dass kein Experte diese Entwicklung der Agrarpreise damals absehen konnte.


"Diese Entwicklung hat alle überrascht"
Die Expertin Karin Holm-Müller, Professorin für Ressourcen und Umweltökonomik an der Universität Bonn, hat dafür eine Erklärung: Vor allem weltweit schlechte Ernten in den vergangenen Jahren und damit unkalkulierbare Ereignisse haben zu der Preisentwicklung geführt. "Im Nachhinein ist man immer klüger. Aber selbst renommierte Institute haben das nicht vorhergesehen, das hat alle überrascht."

"Chance für Kleinbauern"
Die Umweltökonomin geht davon aus, dass die Bioenergie dabei keinen großen Einfluss auf die Weltmarktpreise von Nahrungsmitteln hat, dazu sei ihr Anteil weltweit zu gering. Eine Ausnahme könnte Mexiko sein, wo große Mengen an Mais für den Benzinmarkt in den USA aufgekauft werden.
Karin Holm-Müller betont, dass die derzeitige Situation nicht nur Nachteile hat: "Den Landwirten geht es so gut wie lange nicht. Gerade auch in Entwicklungsländern können kleinbäuerliche Betriebe erstmals wieder von ihrer Arbeit leben."

"Bioenergie hat Potential"
Auch Bernd Geisen, Geschäftsführer beim Bundesverband für Bioenergie in Bonn, hält es prinzipiell für ein positives Signal, dass Lebensmittel nicht mehr zu Dumpingpreisen verkauft werden. Ein großes Potenzial für Bioenergie, deren Anteil am End-Energieverbrauch im vergangenen Jahr bei 6,2 Prozent lag, sieht er auch bei anhaltend hohen Preisen für Agrarprodukte: "Es gibt viele Abfall- und Restprodukte in der Landwirtschaft, wie zum Beispiel Gülle, Stroh oder Waldrestholz, die zur Erzeugung von Bioenergie eingesetzt werden können."
Geisen räumt aber ein, dass die Investitionen in neue Biogasanlagen derzeit nahe Null sind. Das liege aber nicht nur an dem gestiegenen Preis für Agrarprodukte: "Im Sommer entscheidet der Bundestag über ein neues Gesetz zu erneuerbaren Energien. Ob die Bioenergie Zukunft hat, hängt jetzt vor allem von der Politik ab."
Natürlich freut sich auch Werner Prümers, dass er für seine Erzeugnisse heute einen guten Preis bekommt. Wenn da nicht diese riesige Investition wäre: "Zum heutigen Zeitpunkt würde ich nicht mehr in die Biogasanlage investieren." Aber das sei wirtschaftliches Risiko, das er zum Glück nicht alleine geschultert habe.

Links
Vom Energiewirt zum Landwirt[Markt 02.04.07]
Interview: Wie der Biosprit das Brot verdrängt[14.04.08]

Mehr zum Thema
Umwelt fährt besser ohne BiospritEin Kommentar von Detlef Reepen
Was macht Lebensmittel so teuer? [Aktuelle Stunde]
"Erst der Teller, dann der Tank"Gespräch mit Hans-Joachim Preuß, Generalsekretär der Deutschen Welthungerhilfe.
Fragen und Antworten zur Hunger-Krise [tagesschau.de]
Institut für Lebensmittel- und Ressourcenökonomik an der Universität Bonn
Bundesverband Bioenergie